Are Tesco right to dig their heels in and say no to the Unilever price increase?

University / Undergraduate
Modified: 12th Jun 2020
Wordcount: 437 words

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written assignment. Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.ae.

Cite This

Question

Are Tesco right to dig their heels in and say no to the Unilever price increase?

Answer

Unilever have recently requested that many of the retailers they supply accept a price increase (believed to be 10%) to compensate for the lower value of the Pound against the Euro and Dollar (Vandevelde, Daneshkhu and McClean, 2016). Unilever’s rationale is that the goods are often imported and so are originally produced and sold based on Euro or Dollar pricing, effectively allowing the UK retailers to buy more for less money. Tesco have refused to comply and are now no longer having their inventories resupplied by Unilever. This has drawn great public attention, and is a risk to Tesco as it can no longer sell brands such as Pot Noodle, Ben and Jerry’s and Marmite. Notably, many of the products that would be affected by the price rise are actually produced in the UK, such as Marmite, and thus this negates the effect of the Pounds decreased value. Increased prices for retailers would most likely lead to higher prices for consumers as the retailers opt to pass on the cost rather than shrink margins. In this way Tesco is seen as protecting its customers. The action taken by Tesco may well be mirrored by other retailers seeking to gain a strong negotiating position. In this case Unilever may well be forced to relent, as alternative brands could take advantage to grow market share. As such the action taken by Tesco may well prove to be a good negotiating strategy. At the time of writing (before market closing times) both Unilever and Tesco share prices have fallen, but at 3.2% versus 2.2%, respectively, Unilever are faring worse (Google, 2016). Whether the Pounds fall will be short term or sustained will affect the impact and severity of this issue. At present the pound is widely considered to be undervalued, as the UK’s GDP has not fallen and it still offers good investment opportunities (Adinolfi, 2016). Accurate as at 13/10/16.

References

Adinolfi, J. 2016, The pound is already undervalued — so how much weaker can it get? (online), Market Watch, available: [http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-pound-is-already-undervalued-so-how-much-weaker-can-it-get-2016-10-03], accessed: 13/10/16 Google, 2016, Google Finance, available: [https://www.google.co.uk/finance?q=AMS:UNA]; [https://www.google.co.uk/finance?q=LON:TSCO], accessed: 13/10/16 Vandevelde, M. Daneshkhu, S. and McClean, P. 2016, Tesco pulls products over plunging pound (online), Financial Times, available: [https://www.ft.com/content/58560c1e-909a-11e6-8df8-d3778b55a923], accessed: 13/10/16

 

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Give Yourself The Academic Edge Today

  • On-time delivery or your money back
  • A fully qualified writer in your subject
  • In-depth proofreading by our Quality Control Team
  • 100% confidentiality, the work is never re-sold or published
  • Standard 7-day amendment period
  • A paper written to the standard ordered
  • A detailed plagiarism report
  • A comprehensive quality report
Discover more about our
Assignment Writing Service

Essay Writing
Service

AED558.00

Approximate costs for Undergraduate 2:2

1000 words

7 day delivery

Order An Essay Today

Delivered on-time or your money back

Reviews.io logo

1842 reviews

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider